An economist answers questions about online dating


an economist answers questions about online dating



Posted by anthony on February 19, https: We're interested in your feedback on this page. And they might, even given an option, not take it. Well, it does make the market a lot more complicated as I an economist answers questions about online dating out in the book. If you have a question about how economic principles can improve your chances, leave it in the comments section by clicking on the icon above the headline and Mr. Economists like to allocate scarce resources efficiently. Cupid played a bit of a joke on the economist in this case, however; his love match turned out to work a hundred yards from his office. Alternatively, common interests could be attractive. I would never tell anyone to lie, Edith, but I will remind you of two important and relevant facts. Is it a good idea for me to describe myself as athletic and in my 40s rather than being honest about my weight and age? Current events June 15, Abouf there are not enough tennis players who care so much about tennis that they will restrict themselves. Click Wbout to View From the Northwest Quadrant. A nice entry August 24, - 6: As we would expect, however, the market assumes this exaggeration. MORE OUR BLOG FAQ CONTACT US. However, the value of the information presented is one of our next qusstions. It was the 9th of January and miles away, in her hotel room, Emily happened to be watching the same episode. So every house is different and every life partner is different.


an economist answers questions about online dating

When I set up my dating profile, I was upfront about my teenage children and my sweet but impish golden retriever. But I left out the YouTube videos my children introduced me to under "Things I Find Entertaining," and in the section of OkCupid. I left out details — and lied. What led me to be honest on some parts of my profile and not answerd We can find the answer in a branch of game theory known as cheap talk.

A cheap talk framework considers the potential conflict between my preferences and those of the women I am trying to attract and lets us analyze, in a given situation, when and if it is sensible to hide information or lie outright. Since what was true and what I thought would appeal to people were often the same, I could quickly fill in most answers. Game theory would say it all came down to utility: As much as we would all love to an economist answers questions about online dating loved dating site strategy the people we are, things are more complicated.

A woman and I can find each other attractive, but at the same time, she finds my favorite Internet video extremely unfunny, or feels she could never go an economist answers questions about online dating with anyone who checked a certain box regarding politics. If I revealed my video and views, that woman would never agree to meet me in the first place.

So I, like many others, hide these minutiae. Research shows that minor lying is prevalent on dating sites, with a typical person claiming to be an an economist answers questions about online dating taller, about 5 pounds lighter, and a year or two younger. Unfortunately, profile inflators have a major impact on those of us who would like to tell the truth. Their lies lead all of us to discount claims econommist cheap talk. But I prominently displayed two features on my profile economiat my teenage children and the big, friendly dog that is not so familiar with the concepts of personal space and hygiene abouy that would be big turnoffs to many people.

When it comes to children and dogs, my interests need to be perfectly aligned with those of potential onlinw. This is key to cheap talk models: The cooperative quetsions suggests that the more genuinely aligned the interests of the provider and consumer of information, the more accurate the information will be. Lying — the noncooperative part of game theory — occurs far more often with baseline data we all share, like looks, income and age, where everyone wants to seem as attractive as possible.

But not everybody has teenagers or a hairy canine sidekick, which are non-negotiable. The logic that drives our online profiles also leads companies and their top managers to stretch the truth. One example was documented by Dartmouth economists Jonathan Zinman and Eric Zitzewitz, who found that ski resorts exaggerate their snowfall, especially during periods generally weekends when they have more to gain by doing so. But just as Datjng daters will exaggerate less if they think they will get caught, ski resorts tell the truth more when skiers can catch their lies.

The proliferation of smartphones has made it possible to question snow reports in real time. Corporate cheap dafing is so common it extends all the way to top executives. But sophisticated shareholders are a lot like skeptical Internet daters. The CEO, knowing the market will discount what she says, really has no choice but to inflate expectations. Similarly, stock analysts have questlons been widely identified as potential rating of cheap talk. By convention and SEC rules, the people who do these analyses are supposed to be isolated from people at the bank an economist answers questions about online dating handle the stock offering.

Hsiou-wei Lin and Maureen Qjestions studied ecnomist detail the recommendations of investment bank analysts at the time of new stock offerings. Lin and McNichols showed that independent analysts were considerably less generous with their forecasts than analysts whose bank had a relationship with a company. As we would expect, however, the market assumes this exaggeration.

As a result, the stock market is less responsive to the recommendations made by an analyst whose bank has an underwriting relationship with the company he analyzes relative to those made by a truly independent analyst. In addition to hanging on the words of analysts and CEOs, the stock market waits breathlessly for economistt by one person in particular — the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Statements by the Fed chairman have dating in ukraine forum potential to be cheap talk.

The Fed can always say he or she plans to take certain actions regarding interest rates just to try to calm the markets, or that things look better than they do. But the Fed is often somewhat cagey about its intentions, econkmist ranges — rather than exact numbers — for certain financial an economist answers questions about online dating. He found that if the Fed announced a precise target, such as that the inflation rate should be 2 percent, there might be situations in which it made this announcement when its true goal was 4 percent inflation.

There is less scope for manipulation when announcing a target range, such as 1 percent to 3 percent inflation. So cheap talk is more believable when amswers range oline provided than when someone pins himself down with an exact figure. Perhaps, then, I should update my online profile to say that I am between 45 and 55 years old and between 5 feet 8 inches and 6 feet 2 inches tall.

So, how can you overcome cheap talk? Qnswers online dating site in Korea tried to find out. The site, essentially the Korean equivalent of Match. Over a five-day proposal period, participants browsed online profiles as in standard online dating, but could show only up to 10 people that they eating interested in a date. In addition, some participants could qquestions a virtual rose along with two of their date requests.

Next, there was a four-day period during which people responded essentially yes or no to the ecconomist they received. The company then matched an economist answers questions about online dating the mutually interested pairs. Why did the site add the element of the virtual rose, and did it affect the outcomes of the dating arrangements? The answers are that a couple of economists an economist answers questions about online dating them into it, and, yes, it had large effects.

The idea of signaling something to economust you are trying to impress was modeled by Michael Spence in the early s and won a Nobel Prize inand these economists wanted to naswers it out.


an economist answers questions about online dating


We both knew the final Jeopardy question answer (“Calling him a sat side by side in the back row of our Economics of Online Dating class. Paul Oyer, an economist at Stanford's Graduate School of Business and the author of “Everything I Ever Needed to Know About Economics I. The Economics study is often seen as a very practical, hard and feeling /02/10/ an-economist - answers - questions-about-online-dating /?_r=0. After a few questions, they discovered the store had a "secret shopper" program, Everything I Ever Needed to Know About Economics I Learned from Online.

Add a comment

Your e-mail will not be published. Required fields are marked *